ABSTRACT
Objectives: We would like to report a case in which a COVID-19 patient who was transferred to our hospital due to a lack of medical resources due to the COVID-19 outbreak in Daegu, South Korea, on February, 2020, underwent double lung transplantation after 110 days with VV-ECMO support and performed double lung re-transplantation 865 days after lung transplantation. Method(s): ECMO was performed on a total of 69 patients with COVID-19-related acute circulatory/ respiratory failure from February 2020 to December 2022. Among them, 16 patients were registered for lung transplantation, and 5 out of 16 registered patients performed lung transplants. One in five people who performed lung transplantation performed retransplantation on the 865thday after transplantation. Result(s): A 52-year-old female patient was transferred to our hospital, and VV-ECMO was performed the next day. The double lung transplantation was performed 112 days after hospitalization and was discharged 238 days after surgery. 668 days after lung transplantation, home O2 was applied as bronchitis obliterans syndrome, and her lung function deteriorated rapidly later, and re-transplantation was decided. In the patient;s HLA test, HLA class I cPRA% was 32% and HLA class II cPRA% was 100%. Desensitization was performed six times plasmapheresis with administrating Botezomib and immunoglobulin, and then re-transplantation was performed on the 865th day after lung transplantation. The patient has maintained her daily life without any special complications other than the occurrence of central DI after surgery. The pathological findings of the lung previously transplanted to the patient were acute rejection (ISHLT grade A2), chronic airway rejection (ISHLT grade C1, B0), and chronic vascular rejection (ISHLT grade D1). Conclusion(s): The long term result of patients who performed lung transplantation with COVID 19 related respiratory failure is still unknown. Therefore, even patients who have undergone long-term VV-ECMO support due to COVID 19 related respiratory failure are expected to achieve good results if lung transplantation is needed by carefully approaching and treating with a multidisciplinary approach.
ABSTRACT
The rapid and large-scale roll-out of new COVID-19 vaccines has led to unprecedented challenges in assessing vaccine safety. In 2021, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) processed about 1.7 million safety reports related to COVID-19 vaccines in the EudraVigilance (EV) database and identified more than 900 potential signals. Beyond the large amount of information to be processed, the evaluation of safety signals has faced several difficulties and limitations, both in the assessment of case reports and in the investigation of databases. The evaluation of a signal of corneal graft rejection (CGR) with Vaxzevria® was no exception to this. In this commentary, we present the challenges encountered in making regulatory decisions in the context of evolving evidence and knowledge. The pandemic crisis emphasised the importance of quick and proactive communication to address the many questions and, above all, to ensure the transparency of safety data.
ABSTRACT
Introduction/Aim: The prevalence of and risk factors for acute cellular (ACR) and antibody mediated rejection (AMR) in lung transplant (LTx) recipients is unclear. Method(s): We performed a retrospective cohort study of all living LTx recipients between January 2020 and September 2022. Recipients with COVID-19 infection and those diagnosed with and/or treated for ACR or AMR were identified. Baseline demographics are described. A logistic regression univariate analysis was used to identify risk factors for rejection. Result(s): 128/387 (33%) LTx recipients tested positive to SARS-CoV-2 during the study period. 44 (32.3%) patients were investigated for graft dysfunction, with persistent loss of >=10% of FEV 1 at >=90-days in 37 (31.4%), median was 54.5 years (23-76). There was no significant difference between gender, disease severity or presence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) at time of COVID-19 infection. 9(20.5%) recipients experienced rejection, 3 (6.8%) with AMR, 5 (11.4%) ACR, and 1 (2.3%) both. Median time to onset of rejection was 59 days (16-239). Change in FEV 1 post COVID-19 was not significantly different between recipients with and without rejection, with mean volume loss in rejection group 559 mL (SD 678 mL, 22.9%), and 842 mL (SD 824 mL, 42.9%) in non-rejecters. Univariate logistic regression of risk factors demonstrated younger patients were at higher risk of rejection (OR 0.95 [95% CI 0.90-1.00] p = 0.05). Female gender was weakly associated with rejection (OR 0.21 [95% CI 0.04-1.18] p = 0.08). Time post-transplant, severe COVID illness, early COVID-19 treatment did not show association. Conclusion(s): Acute rejection occurs frequently following COVID infection and should be considered a differential in persistent allograft dysfunction. Younger age and female gender were associated with increased risk of rejection. The volume of lung function lost did not differentiate between those who did and did not suffer rejection;we hypothesise due to non-alloimmune inflammatory processes.
ABSTRACT
Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with ex vivo T cell receptor (TCR) alphabeta+ T cell and CD19+ B cell depletion is an effective approach for children with primary immune deficiency disorders (PIDD) as it combines advantages of high CD34+ cell dose facilitating rapid engraftment with low risk of Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD). The ideal pre-conditioning regimen that facilitates robust donor engraftment without increasing risk of transplant related mortality has not been well defined with this approach. Method(s): We report the outcomes of 4 pediatric subjects: Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD) (2), Wiskott Aldrich Syndrome (WAS) (1), and RAC2 deficient Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (1) who underwent haploidentical HCT with TCRalphabeta+ T cell/CD19+ depletion at Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital/Moffitt Cancer Center from 2020-2022 (NCT04414046). Pre-conditioning regimen consisted of distal thymoglobulin (7.5 mg/kg), fludarabine (175 mg/m2), thiotepa (10 mg/kg) and pharmacokinetic guided busulfan targeting a cumulative area under curve (cAUC) (65-75 mgxhr/L). Rituximab (200 mg/m2) was administered on day +1. Result(s): The median age at HCT was 51 months (range 10-163 months). All patients received mobilized peripheral blood stem cells from HLA- haploidentical donors (paternal=1, maternal=1 sibling=2). Median busulfan cAUC for all patients was 69 mgxhr/L (range 65-76). Median CD34 and TCR alphabeta T cell dose was 9.13x106 cells/kg (range 7.0-18.9x106) and 0.7x105 cells/kg (range 0.09-1.0x105). Median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 11 days (9-12) and 11 days (range 8-15), respectively. All 4 patients are alive with median follow-up of 19.5 months (range 7-24). One patient developed late VOD without organ dysfunction that resolved with defibrotide. At last follow up, peripheral T and myeloid chimerisms exceeded 90% in all 4 patients. Average time to CD4 recovery (> 200x106/L) was 142 days. Pre-existing inflammatory bowel disease in CGD (n=1) and WAS (n=1) patients resolved immediately following transplant. There was no graft failure, and none developed Grade III-IV acute or extensive chronic GVHD. Patient with WAS developed recurrent autoimmune cytopenias requiring corticosteroids, rituximab, sirolimus and daratumumab, and ultimately resolved. Viral reactivations included EBV (n= 1), adeno (n= 1), HHV6 (n= 2), BK (n=1), norovirus (n=1), and late HSV (n=1), all responded to antivirals without disease. All patients acquired SARS-Cov-2 after transplant and recovered without sequelae. Conclusion(s): TCR alphabeta+ and CD19+ depleted haploidentical transplantation using a reduced toxicity conditioning regimen with pharmacokinetic guided busulfan, fludarabine, thiotepa and thymoglobulin is well-tolerated in young children with PIDD that results in rapid, durable engraftment with low likelihood of GVHD and graft rejection.Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
Asymptomatic subjects account for 25 to 45% of SARS-CoV-2 infections, and in particular, subjects on mild immunosuppressive therapy may have symptoms masked and could spread virus for an extended period of time. To determine the cumulative incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections and associated risk factors, we conducted a prospective clinical and serological survey in a cohort of 278 liver transplant recipients (LTRs) from Central Italy. Three different serology tests were performed every 4 months in 259 LTRs between April 2020 and April 2021: one based on raw extract of whole SARS-CoV-2 virus and two on specific viral antigens (nucleoprotein and receptor binding domain) to detect specific IgG, IgM and IgA. Hundred fifteen LTRs who reported symptoms or close contact with a SARS-CoV-2-positive subject, or had a positive serological result underwent molecular testing by standard screening procedures (RT-PCR on naso-pharyngeal swab). Thirty-one past or active SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified: 14 had positive molecular test (64% symptomatic), and 17 had positive serology only (18% symptomatic). SARS-CoV-2 infection was not statistically related to gender, age, obesity, diabetes, renal impairment, type of anti-rejection therapy or time from transplant. Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 cases (61.3%) were more frequent in males and in those with glomerular filtrate rate >50 ml/min. Overall, the addition of repeated serology to standard diagnostic molecular protocols increased detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection from 5.1% to 10.9%. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among our LTRs (11.2%) is comparable to the general population of Central Italy, considered a medium-impact area. Only one asymptomatic subject (6%) was found to carry SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory tract at the time of serological diagnosis.Copyright © 2021 The Authors
ABSTRACT
Background: The outcomes following COVID positive donor utilization for heart transplant are unknown. Method(s): UNOS database was analyzed for heart transplants performed after the declaration of COVID pandemic on 11th March 2020 until 31st December 2021. The cohort was divided into two groups based on donor COVID antigen and NAAT results. Result(s): Since the onset of pandemic, there were 6855 heart transplants reported. COVID antigen or NAAT results were available in 5529 donors at the time of donation, of which 38 (0.7%) were positive. COVID positive donors (CPD) were accepted for older recipients (age 54 vs 48, p=0.04). Listing status 1 and 2 were similar in both groups (9% vs 5% and 24% vs 23% respectively). Durable mechanical support (LVAD, RVAD, TAH) were similar in both groups pre-transplant (31% vs 33%, p=0.3). There was no difference in days on waitlist (183 vs 176 days, p=0.9). Both groups had similar travel distance (261 vs 239 nautical miles, p=0.4) and ischemic time (3.6 vs 3.5 hours, p= 0.8). Simultaneous renal transplant rates were similar (10% vs 9%, p=0.8). CPD utilization increased with time (figure 1A) and was uniform across most UNOS regions (figure 1B) Post-transplant, there was no difference in length of stay (24 days in both groups) and acute rejection episode prior to discharge (4% vs 8%, p=0.6) or within one year (3% vs 4%). There were no deaths reported in the CPD group during a mean 72 days of follow up (range 0-365 days) (figure 2). Known hospitalization for rejection management were similar (3% vs 4%) post-transplant. Conclusion(s): Active COVID infection in donors did not affect survival or rejection rates in the short-term post-heart transplantCopyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Background:: Since its declaration as a global pandemic on March11th 2020, COVID-19 has had a significant effect on solid-organ transplantation. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of COVID-19 on Liver transplantation (LT) in United States. Method(s):: We retrospectively analyzed the United Network for Organ Sharing database regarding characteristics of donors, adult-LT recipients, and transplant outcomes during early-COVID period (March 11- September 11, 2020) and compared them to pre-COVID period (March 11 - September 11, 2019). Result(s):: Overall, 4% fewer LTs were performed during early-COVID period (4107 vs 4277). Compared to pre-COVID period, transplants performed in early-COVID period were associated with: increase in alcoholic liver disease as most common primary diagnosis (1315 vs 1187, P< 0.01), higher MELD score in the recipients (25 vs 23, P<0.01), lower time on wait-list (52 vs 84 days, P<0.01), higher need for hemodialysis at transplant (9.4 vs 11.1%, P=0.012), longer distance from recipient hospital (131 vs 64 miles, P<0.01) and higher donor risk index (1.65 vs 1.55, P<0.01). Early-COVID period saw increase in rejection episodes before discharge (4.6 vs 3.4%, P=0.023) and lower 90-day graft/patient survival (90.2 vs 95.1 %, P<0.01;92.2 vs 96.5 %, P<0.01). In multivariable cox-regression analysis, early-COVID period was the independent risk factor for graft failure at 90-days post-transplant (Hazard Ratio 1.77, P<0.01). Conclusion(s):: During early-COVID period in United States, overall LT decreased, alcoholic liver disease was primary diagnosis for LT, rate of rejection episodes before discharge was higher and 90-days post-transplant graft survival was lower.Copyright © 2022 The Author(s)
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who have a highly impaired immune response are in need of intensified and safe vaccination strategies to achieve seroconversion and prevent severe disease. METHODS: We searched the Web of Science Core Collection, the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register and the WHO COVID-19 global literature on coronavirus disease from January 2020 to 22 July 2022 for prospective studies that assessed immunogenicity and efficacy after three or more SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses. RESULTS: In 37 studies on 3429 patients, de novo seroconversion after three and four vaccine doses ranged from 32 to 60% and 25 to 37%. Variant-specific neutralization was 59 to 70% for Delta and 12 to 52% for Omicron. Severe disease after infection was rarely reported but all concerned KTRs lacked immune responses after vaccination. Studies investigating the clinical course of COVID-19 found remarkably higher rates of severe disease than in the general population. Serious adverse events and acute graft rejections were very rare. Substantial heterogeneity between the studies limited their comparability and summary. CONCLUSION: Additional SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses are potent and safe in general terms as well as regarding transplant-specific outcomes whilst the Omicron wave remains a significant threat to KTRs without adequate immune responses.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Access to kidney transplantation has always been a problem in the African countries with many patients having to travel to other medically advanced countries in Asia, Europe and America. This involves unnecessary excessive expenditure and the travails of journey and stay in an unknown foreign land. To ease this situation and to provide affordable Renal transplant services in their home land, we have made an effort to start the transplant services at our medical facility and have successfully carried out about 275 transplants over a period starting from Nov 2018 till September 2022. Method(s): All the Kidney transplants done between the period Nov 2018- September 2022 (275 cases) were included in the analysis. All the transplants were performed at a single center and the data were collected progressively during their Pre transplant evaluation, perioperative course and post op follow up. All the laboratory and radiological tests were done locally at the center except the HLA cross matches and tissue typing, which were outsourced to Transplant immunology labs outside the country. All the patients with positive DSA titres [about 70%], underwent Plasmapheresis and received IVIg before the transplantation. immunological assessment was done by NGS high resolution, for A B C DP DQ DR loci and X match was done by SAB analysis for class 1 and Class II antigens. All the patients underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. All Patients received vaccinations for Hepatitis B, Pneumonia, Infuenza & Covid. Result(s): A series of 275 kidney transplants were performed over a period of 42 months [ Nov 2018- September 2022] at a private hospital successfully. All the cases were live donor kidney transplants with majority of the donors being 1st or 2nd degree relatives or spousal donors. About 70% of the patients had some degree of sensitization in the form of weakly positive B cell X match, or positive for DSAs at CL I, CLII with MFIs > 1000. All high-risk patients received induction with rabbit Thymoglobulin, and IV methyl prednisolone. Around 50 patients received Basiliximab. Of all patients, 4were HBsAg positive, and 6 were HIV positive,& HCV 1 patient. 8 patients required pretransplant Parathyroidectomy for refractory hyperparathyroidism, 3 patients required simultaneous native kidney nephrectomy at the time of transplant. 25 patients had multiple renal vessels which were double barreled and anastamosed.4 patients had lower urinary tract abnormalities requiring simultaneous/subsequent repair. Overall, 4 patients underwent 2nd transplant. All the donors underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy. Most of the patients had good immediate graft function except in 40 patients, who had delayed graft function;most of them improving over 2 - 6 weeks. 6 Patients had hyperacute rejection and the graft was lost,.4patients had main renal artery thrombosis, Renal allograft biopsy was done in 20 patients. Overall, the Patient survival was 95 %.at 1 year and graft survival 90%. Conclusion(s): Our experience shows that kidney transplantation is a viable and practical option for End stage kidney disease and can be performed even in resource constrained centers in third world countries and the survival rates of patients and the grafts are comparable to other centers across the world. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: A significant reduction of acute rejection rates was observed after using Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in renal transplant recipients (RTR). However, side-effects like hematological and gastrointestinal intolerance often occur when MMF is used in routine doses.MMF dose reduction is required during its side-effects or co-existing infection in RTR.The outcome of MMF dose modulation in RTR is not well established. COVID-19 pandemic has given an opportunity to study the effect of MMF dose modulation on graft function as large number of RTR who had Covid19 received MMF dose reduction or discontinuation. This study's objective was to determine whether MMF dose reduction or discontinuation was associated with the effect on allograft function after renal transplantation. We included all RTR who had an infection with SARS-CoV2 and received MMF dose reduction or discontinuation Methods: We prospectively collected data of Renal transplant recipients developing covid 19 infection during the first and second covid waves. Management including decision on admission, immunosuppression modulation, antibiotics were done based on clinician's discretion subject to logistics and the prevailing guidelines by the ISOT. All patients were followed up for minimum 15 months for graft dysfunction, biopsy rate, biopsy proven acute rejection ( BPAR). The effect of immunosuppression modulation - MMF cessation (Group A) Vs MMF reduction/no manipulation (Group B) and its bearing on the incidence of rejection and was compared. Additional factors such as follow - up sub therapeutic CNI levels, development of DSA ( when done ), steroid increment were studied regression model. Kaplan - meier survival curves for 24 months drawn. Result(s): Among 251 renal transplant patients with SARS-CoV2 infection, 38 patients died during Index admission. 45 patients has not completed for 15 months.168 patients completed 15 month follow - up. Among them, anti-metabolite were reduced in 115 ( 68.5%), stopped in 42 (25%), not manipulated in 5 ( 3%) and 6 patients were not on anti-metabolites and hence excluded from present analysis. Of the 162 patients, MMF had been stopped for 2 weeks or until presumed clinical recovery in 42 patients ( Group A) and the rest in 120 patients ( Group B). Mean age was 41.18 ( +/- 12.8) and 75.6 % had mild COVID. Median duration of follow-up was 18 months ( 14q1-22q3 months). Total Readmission rate was 66 ( 40.7%) (Group A 21( 50%) Vs Group B 45 ( 37.5 %). Graft Biopsy was done in 16% of patients. 9.3 % patients had acute rejection ( 11.9% Vs 8.3%, p 0.05). Among those who had rejection, ABMR was seen in 2, ACR in 3, CABMR in 5 and combined rejection in 1. Conclusion(s): MMF dose modulation to tackle an infectious episode may be associated with graft dysfunction and rejection on follow-up and close follow up is needed in any patient in whom MMF dose in manipulated No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objective: to describe the clinical presentation and outcomes of COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) when managed with high-dose corticosteroids along with standard therapy. Method(s): all nine (9) adult LTRs with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and chest X-ray with predominant bilateral infiltrates and hypoxemia, treated with high-doses corticosteroids similar to an acute rejection treatment were included. All our treated patients presented acute respiratory failure and bilateral pulmonary infiltrates. Result(s): six (6) out of nine (9) patients (66%) treated with bolus evolved favorably. Patients without corticosteroids treatment and severe disease died. Despite lymphopenia and methylprednisolone pulse therapy there were no infectious complications. As per protocol antiviral, bacterial and fungal prophylaxis was prescribed during this period. RT- PCR took long time in becoming negative. Patients who received megadoses of corticosteroids were more likely to live than those who received low doses Conclusion(s): COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients with acute respiratory failure presents a favorable outcome when is managed with high-doses corticosteroids along with standard therapy.
ABSTRACT
Individuals with kidney failure face a future requiring long-term treatment with either dialysis or renal transplantation. Renal transplantation is the preferred form of renal replacement therapy, and is associated with a better quality of life, and usually increased longevity. Unfortunately, owing to excessive co-morbidities, only 30% of patients who develop end-stage renal failure are fit enough for transplantation. Over 90% of kidney transplants still function after 1 year, and most function for >15 years. Improvements in transplant outcomes are attributable to advances in histocompatibility testing, organ procurement, organ preservation, surgical techniques and perioperative care. Long-term outcomes have shown only minor improvements over the last two decades, although this should be considered in the context of deteriorating organ quality as older deceased donors with increasing co-morbidity are used more often to satisfy the need for donor organs. An overall increase in deceased donor numbers has boosted transplant activity in the UK, and it is hoped this will continue with the adoption of the 'opt-out' consent system. Living donor activity remains stable, but the use of non-directed altruistic donation and the living donor exchange scheme have reduced the need for higher immunological risk incompatible transplantation. The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced transplant rates globally, although national transplant systems are now recovering.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused tremendous impact globally due to the significant morbidity and mortality caused by this virus. It is currently known that the probability of becoming seriously ill from this disease is higher in older adults, in people with pre-existing comorbidities, and those with a suppressed immune state. Therefore, transplant patients are not the exception. Considering the importance of this topic and the scarce information on the outcome of this type of patients, especially in Latin America, this series of cases is focused on our experience with 10 kidney transplant patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Method(s): We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of kidney transplant patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) between April 2020 and May 2021. Result(s): The age range of the patients was 41 to 68 years, where 8 of these were men. The most common admission symptoms were fever (80%), dyspnea (70%), myalgia/arthralgia (50%), and headache (50%). The most prevalent laboratory findings were lymphocytopenia and increased inflammatory markers such as D-dimer, LDH, procalcitonin, erythrocyte sedimentation, and ferritin. General management included supportive treatment, statins, and antithrombotic therapy, while the specific treatment options were hydroxychloroquine, antivirals, corticosteroids, Intravenous Immunoglobulin, tofacitinib, and convalescent plasma. All the patients improved and were discharged. Two of them went to the ICU and only one required mechanical ventilation. The majority of the patients (70%) remained with their baseline immunosuppression without dose reduction or suspension. Conclusion(s): Kidney transplant recipients are more susceptible to infections, along with increased disease severity. At the same time their immunosuppressed state may reduce the inflammatory response following this type of infection. Decisions were based on stopping or attenuating the viral load and the systemic inflammation caused by this virus, but at the same time protecting against acute allograft rejection and the coinfection with other pathogens. Our findings suggest that the use of statins and antithrombotic prophylaxis in all hospitalized transplant patients may be beneficial to reduce the risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19 infection. Also, the maintenance of immunosuppressive therapy was not associated with worse outcomes. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Anti Thymocyte Globulin(ATG) is very effective as an Induction and antirejection therapy (ART) agent in renal Transplantation. Equine ATG (eATG) has been used less compared to rabbit ATG(rATG) in tranplantation. Cost of eATG as induction agent is 200 USD, in comparison to rATG, which costs minimum 700 USD per dose (approximately four times more than eATG). Experience with eATG initially was not good because of drug reactions but over the years the molecule has evolved into a better drug and is the preferred drug over rATG in severe Aplastic Anemia without any reactions. Covid pandemic has affected the supply chain of rATG because of vaccine production leading to shortage of rATG. Hence eATG is the only available ATG. Method(s): We present our experience with eATG in a tertiary care nephrology centre for the last 95 renal transplants. Patients have been divided into two groups. Group A- contained HLA matched first degree relatives as renal donors and induction agent was injection Methylprednisolone (MP). Group B- Had Recipients of Deceased or Spousal donors and received eATG 10mg/kg as induction agent single dose. Monitoring of renal function and observation for complications including, infections was done. Blood lymphocyte count was monitored for intial 2 weeks to look for lymphocyte depletion as an indicator of eATG efficacy. Patients were followed upto 5 years post transplant (PTX) and assessment was done at 1,3 and 5 years for graft and patient survival. eATG usage as anti rejection therapy (ART) agent in acute T- cell-mediated rejection(TCMR) : All acute TCMRs (biopsy proved) were treated with eATG 10mg/kg body for 5 consecutive days followed by repeat biopsy and additional eATG therapy depending on patient response. Result(s): Induction Therapy: Table 1,2,3 Number of recipients in GrA were 41 and GrB were 54. Marked decrease in Lymphocyte count in Gr B indicated efficacy of eATG (p<0.05). In the first 90 days post transplant, Acute TCMR ( biopsy proved) was seen in 5(9.7 %) of GrA and 7(12.9 %) of GrB (p>0.05). In GrA 1(2.4%) patient had acute antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) but could not be treated with ART because of presence of active infection. In Gr B 1(1.8%) patient had histopathological features suggestive of ABMR but was C4D negative and patient responded to eATG alone. Infections were noticed in 9.7% (5/41) of GrA patients and 11.1% (6/54) of GrB patients in the first 180 days PTX (p>0.05). Urinary tract infections, respiratory tract infections and soft tissue infections were commonly seen. Post ART oppurtunistic infections were not seen. Comparison of incidence of Acute rejection rates, graft survival, complications rate and patient survival rate show similar results in both the groups. We achieved good efficacy with eATG as induction and ART agent in biopsy proved acute TCMR. No adverse events and no malignancies were observed after eATG therapy. Conclusion(s): eATG can be used as induction and antirejecton therapy agent in TCMR in renal transplantation. eATG is economical compared to rATG. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023